REVIEW PAPER
Soil ecosystem services: trends, challenges, and opportunities for Colombia
1
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Ingeniería, Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Ambientales y Sostenibilidad, Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Colombia
2
Facultad de Ciencias e Ingeniería, Universidad de Boyacá, Colombia
3
Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Colombia
Submission date: 2024-09-06
Final revision date: 2025-01-08
Acceptance date: 2025-04-04
Online publication date: 2025-04-04
Publication date: 2025-04-04
Corresponding author
Andrea Angélica Bernal Figueroa
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Ingeniería, Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Ambientales y Sostenibilidad, Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Cra. 4, 22-61, 110110, Bogotá, Colombia
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Ingeniería, Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Ambientales y Sostenibilidad, Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Cra. 4, 22-61, 110110, Bogotá, Colombia
Soil Sci. Ann., 2025, 76(1)203722
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
As a fundamental ecosystem component, soil houses incredible biodiversity in terms of richness and functionality, so inter and transdisciplinary approaches are needed to understand its dynamics. On a global scale, the suitability of soils and their Ecosystem Services (ES) are decreasing due to the increase in inadequate production or use practices, which reduces the capacity to regulate these essential services for sustainability. It is widely recognized that soil is also a determining factor in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) due to its role in generating healthy food, water regulation, carbon capture, and prevention of biodiversity loss. However, in the case of Colombia, the zoning that has been implemented is mainly due to the supply of land for production and its relationship with food security, without considering the different ES, which generates an incomplete interpretation of its potential and benefits, which leads to the degradation and deterioration of this resource. This review describes general aspects of ES, such as its definition, history, background, and classifications and tools to measure, assess, and model them. Subsequently, the ES are addressed exclusively from soils, and a review of the studies done in Colombia is presented. It concludes by mentioning some challenges and research opportunities regarding the topic and other considerations, which can lead environmental and territorial planning and management decision-makers to address the consideration of ES when planning the use and management of this resource. This study highlights that the study of soil and its ES has taken on greater relevance at a global level due to its role in addressing problems such as climate change, the decrease in biodiversity, water and energy security, and the eradication of hunger or food safety.
REFERENCES (116)
1.
Adhikari, K., Hartemink, A., 2016. Linking soils to ecosystem services–A global review. Geoderma 262, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
2.
Aldana-Domínguez, J., Palomo, I., Gutiérrez-Angonese, J., Arnaiz-Schmitz, C., Montes, C., Narvaez, F., 2019. Assessing the effects of past and future land cover changes in ecosystem services, disservices and biodiversity: A case study in Barranquilla Metropolitan Area (BMA), Colombia. Ecosystem Services 37, 100915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
3.
Ángel-Maya, A., 2000. La Aventura de los Símbolos. Una visión ambiental de la historia del pensamiento. 2nd ed., Serie Construyendo el Futuro 5. Ecofondo y Fundación Colombia Multicolor.
4.
Ash, N., Bennett K, Reid, W., Irwin F, Ranganathan J, Scholes, R., Tomich, T., Brown, C., Gitay, H., Raudsepp-Hearne C., Lee M., 2010. Assessing Ecosystems, Ecosystem Services, and Human Well-being, in: Ecosystems and human well-being. A manual for assessment practitioners, edited by: Ash N., Blanco H., Brown C., Garcia K., Henrichs T., Lucas N., Raudsepp-Hearne C., Simpson R., Scholes R., Tomich T., Vira B., Zurek M., Island Press, 1–32.
5.
Bagstad, K., Villa, F., Johnson, G., Voigt, B., 2011. ARIES - Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services: A guide to models and data. Version 1.0. ARIES report series n.1.
6.
Balvanera, P., Cotler, H., 2007. Acercamientos al estudio de los servicios ecosistémicos. Gaceta Ecológica 84–85, 8–15. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/53....
7.
Bedoya-Gómez, B., Dossman-Gil, M., Marín-Fernández, J., 2021. Valoración ecológica de los servicios ecosistémicos prestados por el suelo en fincas cafeteras en Belén de Umbría, Colombia. Revista de Ciencias Ambientales 55(1), 160–185. https://doi.org/10.15359/rca.5....
8.
Bongaarts, J., Casterline, J., Desai, S., Hodgson, D., MacKellar L., 2019. IPBES 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Population and Development Review 45(3), 680–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.1....
9.
Bouma, J., 2014. Soil science contributions towards Sustainable Development Goals and their implementation: linking soil functions with ecosystem services. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 177, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.2....
10.
Bouma, J., Bonfante, A., Basile, A., van Tol, J., Hack-ten M., Mulder, M., Heinen, M., Rossiter, D., Poggio, L., Hirmas, D., 2022. How can pedology and soil classification contribute towards sustainable development as a data source and information carrier? Geoderma 424, 115988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
11.
Boumans, R., Roman, J., Altman, I., Kaufman, L., 2015. The Multiscale Integrated Model of Ecosystem Services (MIMES): Simulating the interactions of coupled human and natural systems. Ecosystem Services 12, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
12.
Boyd, J., Banzhaf, S., 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 63(2–3), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
13.
Braat, L., de Groot, R., 2012. The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosystem Services 1(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
14.
Brevik, E., Pereg, L., Steffan, J., Burgess, L., 2018. Soil ecosystem services and human health. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health 5, 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coes....
15.
Castro-Romero, M., Valdés-López, C., Barrera-Cataño, J., 2014. Prioridades de restauración ecológica del suelo y sus servicios ecosistémicos asociados, degradados por uso agropecuario en la microcuenca Santa Helena (Suesca-Cundinamarca). Caldasia 36(1), 37–52.
16.
Chaves, M., Gómez-S., R., Ramírez, W., Solano, C., 2021. Evaluación Nacional de Biodiversidad y Servicios Ecosistémicos de Colombia. Resumen para Tomadores de Decisión, Colombia, 98 pp.
17.
Chimello, L., Berkes, F., 2014. What value São Pedro’s procession? Ecosystem services from local people’s perceptions. Ecological Economics 107, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
18.
Clerici, N., Cote-Navarro, F., Escobedo, F., Rubiano, K., Villegas, J., 2019. Spatio-temporal and cumulative effects of land use-land cover and climate change on two ecosystem services in the Colombian Andes. Science of The Total Environment 685, 1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
19.
Colombia. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible – MADS, 2017. PAB Plan de acción de biodiversidad para la implementación de la Política Nacional para la Gestión Integral de la Biodiversidad y sus Servicios Ecosistémicos 2016–2030.
20.
Comerford, N., Franzluebbers, A., Stromberger, M., Morris, L., Markewitz, D., Moore, R., 2013. Assessment and Evaluation of Soil Ecosystem Services. Soil Horizons 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2136/sh12-1....
21.
Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services–CICES, n.d. Cices website. Retrieved february 13, 2024, from https://cices.eu/.
22.
Cordingley, J., Newton, A., Rose, R., Clarke, R., Bullock, J., 2016. Can landscape‐scale approaches to conservation management resolve biodiversity–ecosystem service trade‐offs? Journal of Applied Ecology 53, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2....
23.
Cork, S., Peterson, G., Bennett, E., Petschel-Held, G., Zurek, M., 2006. Synthesis of the storylines. Ecology and Society 11(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2....
24.
Costanza, R., Daly, H., 1992. Natural Capital and Sustainable Development. Conservation Biology 6, 37–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2....
25.
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387. https://www.nature.com/article....
26.
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S., Grasso, M., 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services 28, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
27.
Crossman, N., Burkhard, B., Nedkov, S., Willemen, L., Petz, K., Palomo, I., Drakou, E., Martín-Lopez, B., McPhearson, T., Boyanova, K., Alkemade, R., Egoh, B., Dunbar, M., Maes, J., 2013. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 4, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
28.
Daily, G., 1997. What are ecosystem services? In Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press: 61–85.
29.
Daly, H., 2020. A note in defense of the concept of natural capital. Ecosystem Services 41(101051). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
30.
Dasgupta, P., 2012. Natural capital as economic assets: a review. In Inclusive Wealth Report 2012 Measuring progress toward sustainability. United Nations University–International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change 2012.
31.
de Groot, R., Brander, L., van der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., Christie, M., Crossman, N., Ghermandi, A., Hein, L., Hussain, S., Kumar, P., McVittie, A., Portela, R., Rodriguez, L., ten Brink, P., van Beukering, P., 2012. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services 1(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
32.
de Groot, R., Wilson, M., Boumans, R., 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41(3), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-....
34.
Delibas, M., Tezer, A., Kuzniecow, T., 2021. Towards embedding soil ecosystem services in spatial planning. Cities 113, 103150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.citi....
35.
Dominati, E., Patterson, M., Mackay, A., 2010. A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecological Economics 69(9), 1858–1868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
36.
Doran, J., 2002. Soil health and global sustainability: translating science into practice. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 88(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-....
37.
Doran, J., Parkin, T. (1994). Defining and Assessing Soil Quality. 3–21. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssasp....
38.
Drobnik, T., Greiner, L., Keller, A., Grêt-Regamey, A., 2018. Soil quality indicators - From soil functions to ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 94, 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
39.
Ellili-Bargaoui, Y., Walter, C., Lemercier, B., Michot, D., 2021. Assessment of six soil ecosystem services by coupling simulation modelling and field measurement of soil properties. Ecological Indicators 121, 107211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
40.
Epstein, G., Vogt, J., Mincey, S., Cox, M., Fischer, B., 2013. Missing ecology: integrating ecological perspectives with the social-ecological system framework. International Journal of the Commons 7(2), 432–453. http://www.thecommonsjournal.o....
41.
FAO, 2017. The future of food and agriculture – Trends and challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
42.
Fedesarrollo, 2024. La Tierra para uso Agropecuario en Colombia: Equidad y Productividad (J. Perfetti, Leibovich J., Delgado M., & López E., Eds.). Fedesarrollo. Centro de Investigación Económica y Social.
43.
Folke, C., 2016. Resilience (Republished). Ecology and Society 21(4), 44. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-090....
44.
Giraldo, E., Osorio, L., Tobón, M., 2015. Los servicios ecosistémicos en el ordenamiento ambiental del suelo suburbano del municipio de Pereira, estudio de caso. Luna Azul 40, 240–59. https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.....
45.
Gobierno de Colombia, 2019. Misión Internacional de Sabios para el avance de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación. Colombia, 1–33.
46.
Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., 2007. Capital natural y funciones de los ecosistemas: explorando las bases ecológicas de la economía. Ecosistemas 16(3), 4–14. http://www.revistaecosistemas.....
47.
Greenstone, M., Kelsey, B., 2015. Envirodevonomics: A Research Agenda for an Emerging Field. Journal of Economic Literature 53(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.53....
48.
Harrison, P., Dunford, R., Barton, D. N., Kelemen, E., Martín-López, B., Norton, L., Termansen, M., Saarikoski, H., Hendriks, K., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Czúcz, B., García-Llorente, M., Howard, D., Jacobs, S., Karlsen, M., Kopperoinen, L., Madsen, A., Rusch, G., van Eupen, M., … Zulian, G., 2018. Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach. Ecosystem Services 29, 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
49.
Hattam, C., Böhnke-Henrichs, A., Börger, T., Burdon, D., Hadjimichael, M., Delaney, A., Atkins, J., Garrard, S., Austen, M., 2015. Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment and valuation: Mixed methods or mixed messages? Ecological Economics 120, 126–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
50.
Hauck, J., Albert, C., Fürst, C., Geneletti, D., La Rosa, D., Lorz, C., Spyra, M., 2016. Developing and applying ecosystem service indicators in decision-support at various scales. Ecological Indicators 61, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
51.
Herrick, J., 2000. Soil quality: an indicator of sustainable land management? Applied Soil Ecology 15(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-....
52.
Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales–IDEAM, 2015. Estudio Nacional de la Degradación de Suelos por Erosión en Colombia. IDEAM. http://documentacion.ideam.gov....
53.
Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales - IDEAM, Instituto Humboldt, Instituto José Benito Vives de Andréis e Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi, 2017. Mapa de ecosistemas continentales, costeros y marinos de Colombia. Escala 1:100.000. Memoria Técnica.
54.
Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales – IDEAM, 2013. Análisis de Dinámicas de Cambio de las Coberturas de la Tierra en Colombia. Escala 1:100.000 Periodos 2000–2002 y 2005–2009. IDEAM.
55.
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, 2014. 100 años investigando el mar. El Instituto Español de oceanografía en su centenario (1914–2014).
56.
Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi – IGAC, 2012. Estudio de los conflictos de uso del territorio colombiano. Escala 1:100.000. Imprenta Nacional de Colombia.
57.
Ivanic, K., Stolton, S., Figueroa, C., Dudley, N., 2020. Protected Areas Benefits Assessment Tool + (PA-BAT+): A tool to assess local stakeholder perceptions of the flow of benefits from protected areas. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.C....
58.
Janzen, H., Fixen, P., Franzluebbers, A., Hattey, J., Izaurralde, R., Ketterings, Q., Lobb, D., & Schlesinger, W., 2011. Global prospects rooted in soils science. Soil Science Society of America Journal 75(1), 1–8. https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/dow....
59.
Jax, K., Barton, D., Chan, K., de Groot, R., Doyle, U., Eser, U., Görg, C., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Griewald, Y., Haber, W., Haines-Young, R., Heink, U., Jahn, T., Joosten, H., Kerschbaumer, L., Korn, H., Luck, G., Matzdorf, B., Muraca, B., … Wichmann, S., 2013. Ecosystem services and ethics. Ecological Economics 93, 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
60.
Jeffery, S., Gardi, C., Jones, A., Montanarella, L., Marmo, L., Miko, L., Ritz, K., Peres, G., Römbke, J., van der Putten H., 2010. European Atlas of Soil Biodiversity. European Commission, Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/public...#.
61.
Jónsson, J. Ö., Davídsdóttir, B., 2016. Classification and valuation of soil ecosystem services. Agricultural Systems 145, 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy....
62.
Kenter, J., O’Brien, L., Hockley, N., Ravenscroft, N., Fazey, I., Irvine, K., Reed, M., Christie, M., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Evely, A., Everard, M., Fish, R., Fisher, J., Jobstvogt, N., Molloy, C., … Williams, S., 2015. What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecological Economics 111, 86–99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
63.
Koch, A., McBratney, A., Adams, M., Field, D., Hill, R., Crawford, J., Minasny, B., Lal, R., Abbott, L., O’Donnell, A., Angers, D., Baldock, J., Barbier, E., Binkley, D., Parton, W., Wall, D., Bird, M., Bouma, J., Chenu, C., … Zimmermann, M., 2013. Soil Security: Solving the Global Soil Crisis. Global Policy 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5....
64.
Landis, D., 2017. Designing agricultural landscapes for biodiversity-based ecosystem services. Basic and Applied Ecology 18, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae....
65.
Lavelle, P., Rodríguez, N., Arguello, O., Bernal, J., Botero, C., Chaparro, P., Gómez, Y., Gutiérrez, A., Hurtado, M., Loaiza, S., Pullido, S., Rodríguez, E., Sanabria, C., Velásquez, E., Fonte, S., 2014. Soil ecosystem services and land use in the rapidly changing Orinoco River Basin of Colombia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 185, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee....
66.
Lefcheck, J., Byrnes, J., Isbell, F., Gamfeldt, L., Griffin, J., Eisenhauer, N., Hensel, M., Hector, A., Cardinale, B., Duffy, E., 2015. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms....
67.
Lozada, L., Dias, D., Oliveira, M. 2018. Ecosystem services and use of Afro-descendant land in the Colombian North Pacific: Transformations in the traditional production system. Land Use Policy 75, 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
68.
Machado, J., Villegas-Palacio, C., Loaiza, J., Castañeda, D., 2019. Soil natural capital vulnerability to environmental change. A regional scale approach for tropical soils in the Colombian Andes. Ecological Indicators 96, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
69.
Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural de Colombia (MADR) y Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria (UPRA), 2014. Presentación institucional. https://www.minagricultura.gov....
70.
Martínez-López, J., Bagstad, K., Balbi, S., Magrach, A., Voigt, B., Athanasiadis, I., Pascual, M., Willcock, S., Villa, F., 2019. Towards globally customizable ecosystem service models. Science of The Total Environment 650(2), 2325–2336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
71.
Maydana, G., Romagnoli, M., Cunha, M., Portapila, M., 2020. Integrated valuation of alternative land use scenarios in the agricultural ecosystem of a watershed with limited available data, in the Pampas region of Argentina. Science of The Total Environment 714, 136430, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
72.
McBratney, A., Field, D., Koch, A., 2014. The dimensions of soil security. Geoderma 213, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
73.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment – MEA, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press.
74.
Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible de Colombia – MADS, 2012. Política Nacional para la Gestión Sostenible de la Biodiversidad y sus Servicios Ecosistémicos (PNGIBSE). Colombia, 1–128.
75.
Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible de Colombia – MADS, 2016. Política para la Gestión Sostenible del Suelo. Colombia, 1–94.
76.
Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Colombia – Minciencias, 2021. Política Pública de Apropiación Social del Conocimiento en el marco de la CTeI. Colombia, 1–60.
77.
Morel, J., Chenu, C., Lorenz, K., 2015. Ecosystem services provided by soils of urban, industrial, traffic, mining, and military areas (SUITMAs). Journal of Soils and Sediments 15(8), 1659–1666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368....
78.
Motiejūnaitė, J., Børja, I., Ostonen, I., Bakker, M., Bjarnadottir, B., Brunner, I., Iršėnaitė, R., Mrak, T., Oddsdóttir, E., Lehto, T., 2019. Cultural ecosystem services provided by the biodiversity of forest soils: A European review. Geoderma 343, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
79.
Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K., Daily, G., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P., Lonsdorf, E., Naidoo, R., Ricketts, T., Shaw, M., 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1890/080023.
80.
Neugarten, R., Langhammer, P., Osipova, E., Bagstad, K., Bhagabati, N., Butchart, S., Dudley, N., Elliott, V., Gerber, L., Gutierrez, C., Ivanić, K., Kettunen, M., Mandle, L., Merriman, J., Mulligan, M., Peh, K., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Semmens, D., Stolton, S., and Willcock, S., 2018. Tools for measuring, modelling, and valuing ecosystem services: guidance for Key Biodiversity Areas, natural World Heritage sites, and protected areas. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature. https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.c....
81.
Operationalisation of Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services – OpenNESS, 2017. OpenNESS website. http://www.openness-project.eu....
82.
Ordoñez, M., Galicia, L., Figueroa, A., Bravo, I., Peña, M., 2015. Effects of peasant and indigenous soil management practices on the biogeochemical properties and carbon storage services of Andean soils of Colombia. European Journal of Soil Biology 71, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso....
83.
Ostrom, E., 2000. El Gobierno de los Bienes Comunes (1st ed.). Universidad Autónoma de México.
84.
Pandeya, B., Buytaert, W., Zulkafli, Z., Karpouzoglou, T., Mao, F., Hannah, D., 2016. A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions. Ecosystem Services, 22, 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
85.
Peh, K., Balmford, A., Bradbury, R., Brown, C., Butchart, S., Hughes, F., Ingwall-King, L., MacDonald, M., Pellier, A., Stattersfield, A., Thomas, D., Trevelyan, R., Walpole, M., Merriman, J., 2022. Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based. Assessment (TESSA). Version 3.0. http://tessa.tools.
86.
Peh, K., Balmford, A., Bradbury, R., Brown, C., Butchart, S., Hughes, F., MacDonald, M., Stattersfield, A., Thomas, D., Trevelyan, R., Walpole, M., Merriman, J., 2017. Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA). Version 2.0. http://tessa.tools.
87.
Peh, K., Balmford, A., Bradbury, R., Brown, C., Butchart, S., Hughes, F., Stattersfield, A., Thomas, D., Walpole, M., Bayliss, J., Gowing, D., Jones, J., Lewis, S., Mulligan, M., Pandeya, B., Stratford, C., Thompson, J., Turner, K., Vira, B., … Birch, J., 2013. TESSA: A toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance. Ecosystem Services 5, 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
88.
Pereira, P., Bogunovic, I., Muñoz-Rojas, M., Brevik, E., 2018. Soil ecosystem services, sustainability, valuation and management. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health 5, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coes....
89.
Perrings C., 1994. Biotic diversity, sustainable development, and natural capital. Investing in natural capital: the ecological economics approach to sustainability. Island Press.
91.
Policy Support Systems, n.d. CostingNature and WaterWorld website. Retrieved February 13, 2024, from https://www.policysupport.org/.
92.
Prugh, T., Costanza, R., Cumberland, J., Daly, H., Goodland R., Norgaard R., 1999. Natural capital and human economic survival (2nd ed.). Lewis Publishers.
93.
Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G., Bennett, M. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. PNAS 107(11), 5242–5247.
96.
Rincón-Ruíz, A., Echeverry-Duque, M., Piñeros, A., Tapia, C., David, A., Arias-Arévalo, P., Zuluaga, P., 2014. Valoración integral de la biodiversidad y los servicios ecosistémicos: Aspectos conceptuales y metodológicos. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH).
97.
Robinson, D., Emmett, B., Reynolds, B., Rowe, E., Spurgeon, D., Keith, A., Lebron, I., Hockley, N., 2012a. Soil natural capital and ecosystem service delivery in a world of global soil change. In R. Hester, R. Harrison (Eds.), Issues in Environmental Science and Technology, 41–68, https://doi.org/10.1039/978184...,.
98.
Robinson, D., Hockley, N., Dominati, E., Lebron, I., Scow, K., Reynolds, B., Emmett, B., Keith, A., de Jonge, L., Schjønning, P., Moldrup, P., Jones, S., Tuller, M., 2012b. Natural Capital, Ecosystem Services, and Soil Change: Why Soil Science Must Embrace an Ecosystems Approach. Vadose Zone J. 11(1), https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj201....
99.
Rodriguez, L., Suárez, J., Pulleman, M., Guaca, L., Rico, A., Romero, M., Quintero, M., Lavelle, P., 2021. Agroforestry systems in the Colombian Amazon improve the provision of soil ecosystem services. Applied Soil Ecology 164, 103933. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSO....
100.
Rojas, C., Bocanegra, J., Mariño, J., 2014. Biodiversidad y servicios ecosistémicos en la gestión del suelo-subsuelo. Revista Opera 14, 9–26. http://www.redalyc.org/articul....
101.
Ruíz-Agudelo, C., 2023. The natural capital of the Colombian Pacific basin: Challenges for a megadiverse región with little government assistance. Research & Reviews: Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 11(3), 49-68.
102.
Ruiz-Agudelo, C., Bello, L., 2014. ¿El valor de algunos servicios ecosistémicos de los Andes colombianos?: transferencia de beneficios por meta - análisis. Universitas Scientiarum 19(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javer....
103.
Ruiz-Agudelo, C., Gutiérrez-Bonilla, F., Cortes-Gómez, A., 2022b. The natural capital of the Colombian Orinoco River basin. Intact ecosystems with high rates of anthropogenic change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 12(4), 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/216065....
104.
Ruiz-Agudelo, C., Gutiérrez-Bonilla, F., Cortes-Gómez, A., Suarez, A., 2022c. A first approximation to the Colombian Amazon basin remnant natural capital. Policy and development implications. Trees, Forests and People 10, 100334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.....
105.
Ruiz-Agudelo, C., Suarez, A., Gutiérrez-Bonilla, F., Cortes-Gómez, A., 2022a. The economic valuation of ecosystem services in Colombia. Challenges, gaps and future pathways. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/216065....
106.
SiB Colombia. Biodiversidad para todos, 2024. SiB website. Retrieved december 27, 2024, from https://biodiversidad.co/.
107.
Silva S., Correa F., 2010. Valoración económica del suelo y gestión ambiental: aplicación en empresas floricultoras colombianas. Rev. Fac. Cienc. Econ. 18(1), 247–67.
108.
Silva-Olaya, A., Ortíz-Morea, F., España-Cetina, G., Olaya-Montes, A., Grados, D., Gasparatos, A., Cherubin, M., 2022. Composite index for soil-related ecosystem services assessment: Insights from rainforest-pasture transitions in the Colombian Amazon. Ecosystem Services 57, 101463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
109.
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity – TEEB, 2018. TEEB website http://www.teebweb.org/.
110.
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Thies, C., 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity–ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters 8, 857–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461....
111.
Tyler DesRoches, C., 2020. The preservation paradox and natural capital. Ecosystem Services 41(101058). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
112.
UNESCO - Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura, 2021. Recomendación de la UNESCO sobre la Ciencia Abierta. Conferencia General de la UNESCO, reunida en París del 9 al 24 de noviembre de 2021, en su 41a reunión. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark....
113.
Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria – UPRA, 2015. Gestión del Territorio para Usos Agropecuarios: bases para la formulación de política pública, Colombia, 1–201.
114.
Van Oudenhoven, A., Petz, K., Alkemade, R., Hein, L., & de Groot, R., 2012. Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 21, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
115.
Villa, F., Ceroni, M., Bagstad, K., Johnson, G., Krivov, S., 2009. ARIES (Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services): a new tool for ecosystem services assessment, planning, and valuation. BioEcon.
116.
Wu, J., Feng, Z., Gao, Y., Peng, J., 2013. Hotspot and relationship identification in multiple landscape services: A case study on an area with intensive human activities. Ecological Indicators 29, 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
| eISSN: | 2300-4975 |
| ISSN: | 2300-4967 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
